Curriculum server replacement
Kev and team have been scoping these out and have gone to tender for them. It is an opportunity for us to standardise and automate a number of things and the way this is designed needs your feedback…
For example, we could have:
- standard directory structures in all schools. ie sections of the school network only accessible by staff, where staff leave work for students, where students leave work for teachers and others cannot open this work, delete or alter it, etc etc;
- standard backup processes in every school including a standard drive which is not backed up eg the place to download photos whilst you are using them in portfolios…
- an automated account generation process where students are fed from Maze to DataJug, then their accounts are created automatically on AD, and MyInternet, and all the school has to do is pick up the Acceptable Use policy from the printer in the morning and take it to the new student for signing and filing.
This sort of rollout needs input from you and really solid planning because it impacts on every school and may mean a change to what you are used to. Any ideas how I can facilitate the discussions that needs to be had? For example, I can set up a forum for this topic and you could nominate a person or persons from your school to contribute?
Storage Solutions
What do you think of the idea of making something like this a standard fixture in every classroom? These particular solutions come from a company called Dalmau Designs in Brisbane (http://www.dalmaudesigns.com/). I have no pricing as yet but just wanted to flag the concept with you. If it was to be a diocesan initiative, we’d go to tender for it.
In terms of Infrastructure, we already have devices in teacher hands, projectors in every room, wireless in every classroom. Is 2009 the year to focus on:
- server upgrades and consistent backup processes;
- better bandwidth?
- full automation of account generation?
- further upgrades to classroom infrastructure so that the envrioment is getting closer to what is required to support constant student use?
There is a lot of discussion between schools at present about how they will get devices into student hands but manage ICT in schools without necessarily increasing tech support. Mobile labs, battery bays, student initiated rebuilds from USB, automated connection to school networks, automated account generation (including MyInternet, active directory and DataJug) the moment a student enrols…etc. These are all related issues because they all contribute to whether or not ICT facilities in schools are accessible to the everyday teacher and all students in all KLAs, and sustainable economically.
There is interest in eeePCs because they are cheap.
There is interest in OpenOffice and Ubuntu…But the Microsoft licensing rules are squashing that. Now that all our schools are on a school desktop agreement, you have to pay for every desktop on the network, regardless of whether you have Microsoft products on them or not.
There is interest in the notion of battery bays. But Jason in my team has pointed out that these bays can become redundant the moment you change to a different device or if the company decides that new versions have different battery types. Because eeePCs are so cheap, it may be worth purchasing the devices and the battery bays….
From a system point of view, I am constantly looking for things we can do systemically to support your ideas and needs. Mobile labs and flexible learning areas seem to be the thing everyone is asking for. People want facilities to complement labs and provide more options for pedagogy. Many of you already use laptop labs. But issues like security have been raised.
Please click on comment below then register for this blog and leave a comment.